Talk:Sailor Galaxia

From WikiMoon
Jump to: navigation, search

Latest edit rolled back because it was completely copy/pasted from Wikipedia. Kerochan no Miko 12:24, 30 January 2008 (MST)

Oh, sorry. I didn't know I copy-pasted those infos from Wikipedia. (This unsigned comment was left by SailorYea, February 23, 2009)


I changed the bit about the cloaked figure Galaxia encounters in the manga, being Chaos. In Picture Collection V's All Character section, the cloked figure is clearly identified as Wiseman. Davi Williams 09:37, 13 July 2007 (MST)

Galaxia's Home Planet[edit]

At one point in the manga, Galaxia is seen destroying a planet by simply pointing at it. Was that her home planet or just some random planet cause it was little confusing to me? --Sailor Simon

I don't recall Galaxia saying she destroyed her homeplanet, just abandoning it. Which Act are you talking about? Silver 15:31, 19 April 2010 (MST)
Stars 5, this page to be exact.--Sailor Simon
I don't know that that's her home planet or even that she destroyed it. It's kind of hard to tell, if you ask me. Kerochan no Miko 12:04, 20 April 2010 (MST)
Hrm. That's interesting - in Kakyuu-Ouhi Kourin Galaxia says that she destroyed "her own star." That's myu continuity, but still.... Kerochan no Miko 20:23, 20 April 2010 (MST)


Shouldn't we add to her table that Queen Nehellenia was an associate? I mean, Galaxia did help her to escape from that dimension so that Nehellenia could have her revenge. - JMF 01:19, 18 August 2011 (MST)

Galaxia helped her out of that dimension so that Saturn would re-age. It had nothing to do with wanting to help Nehellenia on a personal level or being her ally. I strongly disagree that they were "associates" just because Galaxia decided to use her. Kerochan no Miko 17:47, 17 August 2011 (MST)
A better argument would be, Nehellenia actually doesn't know who Galaxia is... They never had direct contact Cartwheelingfiesta 21:04, 17 August 2011 (MST)
They did speak to each other. But it's true that Nehellenia didn't know who was helping her. Kerochan no Miko 21:41, 17 August 2011 (MST)
They did not ever meet is what I'm saying. It was just a voice... Cartwheelingfiesta 23:13, 17 August 2011 (MST)
But they did have contact, even if it wasn't face-to-face. But still, we're arguing the same point so it's ridiculous to argue. Kerochan no Miko 00:26, 18 August 2011 (MST)


Her bracelets shattered, and she disappeared forever.
1) The sentence describes quite accurately what happened in that panel: she didn't keel over dead, she disappeared. It probably meant that she was dead, yes, but that's not the best choice of phrase, imho.
2) What on earth is wrong with "sugar-coating it"? This is Sailor Moon, for heaven's sake, not some blood-and-guts shonen manga. I see absolutely no reason to avoid slightly glossed-over phrasing, considering the canon. It's not like we're replacing death with abduction by the Negaverse or some such nonsense.
If anyone has issues with this, please take it up here rather than engaging in edit wars.Kerochan no Miko 16:59, 14 March 2012 (MST)

Sailor Sun[edit]

Was she like Sailor Sun or something? Supermariosailormoon 14:51, 21 March 2012 (MST)

No, she was Sailor Galaxia. Kerochan no Miko 17:32, 21 March 2012 (MST)


I don't see what's wrong with saying "galaxia" means galaxy in other languages. After all, Naoko often uses terms and phrases from foreign languages other than English, as we have noted in their respective articles, so it's not unlikely she picked it from one of them. Silver (talk) 20:30, 10 November 2014 (MST)

The other languages mentioned derive the word from the original Greek/Latin root, and since we don't know where Naoko actually got it from it would be speculation to mention specific languages. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2014 (MST)
Well, I don't think it would be speculation to mention specific languages as I did, just like it isn't to mention them in the Tuxedo La Smoking Bomber article, because I never stated Naoko got it from them in the actual note. However, with your last edit the note makes more sense to me, so no more objections on my part. Silver (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2014 (MST)